
Welded frames carry presses, conveyors, cranes, robot bases and mobile machinery. They are designed to be strong, and on paper they are. Yet months or years into service a crack appears at a weld, grows, and eventually takes the machine out of production.
That is fatigue, and it is the most common way welded structures fail. The good news is that it is predictable. Fatigue analysis with Finite Element Analysis (FEA) shows which welds are at risk, how long they will last under your real loads, and which design changes will stop the cracks before they start.
Welded joints have much lower fatigue strength than the plain steel around them, for three reasons:
One practical consequence surprises many designers: the fatigue strength of an as-welded joint barely depends on the grade of steel. Switching to a higher-strength steel will not fix a weld detail that is cracking.
A frame can stay well below its yield strength and still crack. Fatigue depends on the stress range each cycle and on the number of cycles, not on the peak stress alone, and machines often see millions of cycles over their life.
That is why a static check, like our FEA of a beam bracket for structural integrity, is the starting point, and a fatigue check is the next step for any welded part that is loaded again and again.
Three established methods are used to assess the welds:
A fatigue prediction is only as good as the loads behind it. The most reliable sources are:
Repetitive operations are exactly where fatigue matters; in our structural analysis of a 6-DOF robotic drilling arm, the repeated drilling load is what makes a fatigue check on the peak-stress areas worthwhile.
Fatigue life is very sensitive to the stress range, so modest changes at the right place can extend it many times over:
Stress tends to build at weld lines, bolt holes and cut-out edges, which is exactly what our FEA of a battery module frame looked at before pinpointing where the frame needed reinforcement.
Welding heat does more than join parts: it leaves residual stresses and pulls the frame out of shape as it cools. Thermal and structural simulation of the welding heat input predicts this distortion and helps choose a welding sequence and fixturing that keep the frame straight. The heat-source modelling is the same as in our transient thermal analysis of a laser heat source on a plate.
Usually the IIW recommendations and EN 1993-1-9 (Eurocode 3), BS 7608, or the standard your industry or customer requires.
They are not essential, but they make the prediction much more reliable. Without them we build the load spectrum from your duty cycle and state the assumptions clearly.
Yes. We model the frame, match the analysis to the crack location and test repair options before you weld anything.
Send your CAD files, weld details and a short description of the loads through our contact page. We will reply with a scope, timeline and quote.
Whether you are designing a new frame or dealing with cracks in service, our engineers can predict weld fatigue life and show you exactly which changes will make the frame last. Send us your CAD files and loads, and we will reply with a clear scope and quote.
Cover photo: Maxime Agnelli on Unsplash
