
Machines and robots are judged on three things: accuracy, speed and uptime. A robot arm that bends under its payload loses positioning accuracy, a machine frame that resonates leaves chatter marks, and a welded bracket that cracks after a few million cycles stops a production line. Most of these problems are designed in, and they are expensive to fix once the machine is built and installed.
Finite Element Analysis (FEA) lets machine builders and robotics teams see how a design deflects, vibrates and wears before any metal is cut, and Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) does the same for cooling. This guide covers the eight analyses that matter most for machinery and robotics, what each one tells you, and what you need to get started.
Machinery is usually built in small numbers, or even as a one-off, so there is rarely room for a prototype that fails. Simulation helps you:
For precision machinery, stiffness often matters more than strength. A part can be far from breaking and still bend enough to ruin accuracy.
We took this approach in our structural strength analysis of a 6-DOF robotic drilling arm and its joints, where the complete arm and its bolted joints were checked under drilling loads. The same checks apply to the structures that support a machine, as in our FEA of a beam bracket for structural integrity.
Every structure has natural frequencies. If a motor, a spindle, a gear mesh or the robot's own motion excites one of them, the machine resonates.
Once the mode shape is known, the fix is often simple: a rib in the right place, a stiffer mount or a different support layout.
Machines run for millions of cycles, so most structural failures are fatigue failures, and they usually start at welds, holes and sharp corners.
Bolted joints hold machines together, and they can fail in ways a simple hand calculation misses: loss of preload, joint slip, gapping between plates or bolt fatigue.
We used the same preload-then-load approach in our FEA of a bolted flange joint under bolt preload and pressure.
In moving machinery every kilogram costs: heavier arms and carriages need bigger motors and gearboxes, accelerate more slowly and use more energy.
A fixture that flexes under clamping or cutting forces moves the part, and the error ends up in every part it holds.
Our FEA and optimisation of an industrial fixture in SolidWorks Simulation is an example of this kind of study.
Heat is the enemy of accuracy and reliability. It limits motor and drive performance, and thermal growth moves spindles, axes and tool tips.
Machine guards and robot cells must contain broken tools, ejected parts and collisions.
To give you an accurate quote and get started quickly, send us as much of the following as you have:
Static analysis checks stress and deflection under a given load. Modal analysis finds the natural frequencies at which the structure wants to vibrate. Fatigue analysis predicts how many load cycles a part can survive. Most machines need all three.
Yes. Send the CAD model and a description of the loads, speeds and cycles. If some data is missing, we help you estimate it and state every assumption clearly in the report.
Ansys Mechanical and SolidWorks Simulation for structural, modal and fatigue work, Abaqus for complex contact and non-linear problems, Ansys Maxwell for electric machines and Ansys Fluent for cooling.
Yes. Topology optimisation and material comparisons show where weight can come out without losing stiffness, and the lighter design is then checked for strength, vibration and fatigue.
Send your CAD files and a short description of what you need to check through our contact page. We will reply with a scope, timeline and quote.
Whether you are building a new machine, upgrading a robot cell or chasing a vibration or cracking problem, our engineers can analyse it and show you exactly where to improve it. Send us your CAD files and requirements, and we will recommend the right analysis and reply with a clear scope and quote.
